PhoneRocket Review Our evaluation of Samsung Galaxy S4 Active Featured in Best Rugged vs Moto X

Performance

Processing power and speed

Geekbench and BrowserMark

Graphics

3D and 2D graphics

AnTuTu 3D, GLBenchmark 2.5 and GLBenchmark 2.7

Battery Life

How long will the battery last

Talk time (3G), Talk time and Battery capacity

Reviews

How do our trusted review sites rank these products?

Reviews from gsmarena.com, phonearena.com, techradar.com, pocket-lint.com and 1 more

PhoneRocket Score

Performance, Graphics, Battery Life and Reviews

Winner
Samsung tablets Samsung Galaxy S4 Active Featured in Best Rugged 

PhoneRocket recommends the Samsung tablets Samsung Galaxy S4 Active Featured in Best Rugged  based on its performance.

See full details

Benchmarks Real world tests of Samsung Galaxy S4 Active Featured in Best Rugged vs Moto X

geekbench Processor and memory performance

When we ran several benchmarks repeatedly over a 20 minute period, we noted that the Galaxy S4 throttled the CPU and Adreno 320 graphics chip and benchmark numbers dropped.
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active Featured in Best Rugged | by MobileTechReview (May, 2013)

BrowserMark How fast does the web browser load pages

The web browser is fast and functional, with support for multiple windows, embedded YouTube videos, along other gimmicks like smart scroll for panning by tilting the phone and air gestures for navigating without having to touch the screen.
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active Featured in Best Rugged | by PhoneArena (Jun, 2013)

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Samsung tablets Samsung Galaxy S4 Active Featured in Best Rugged

Reasons to consider the
Samsung tablets Samsung Galaxy S4 Active Featured in Best Rugged

Report a correction
Better overall performance 1,775 vs 1,220 More than 45% better geekbench score
Has expandable storage SD, SDHC, SDXC vs None Use storage cards to increase your phone's capacity for apps and data
Significantly higher resolution 1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720 2.2x higher resolution
Significantly sharper screen 440 ppi vs 312 ppi More than 40% sharper PPI; enjoy photo-realistic, crisp images
More cores Quad core vs Dual core Twice as many cores; each additional core lets your phone do more without visible UI slowdowns and jerkiness
More battery capacity 2,600 mA·h vs 2,200 mA·h Around 20% more battery capacity
Faster processor 1.9 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 10% faster processor; run computation-intensive applications, such as photo editing, faster
Longer talk time (3G) 900 min vs 780 min More than 15% longer talk time (3G); go days without charging
Bigger screen 5" vs 4.7" More than 5% bigger screen
Thinner 9.1 mm vs 10.4 mm Around 15% thinner
Better theoretical download speed 100 Mb/s vs 84 Mb/s Around 20% better theoretical download speed; enjoy lightning fast downloads on modern networks
Front view of Motorola Moto X

Reasons to consider the
Motorola Moto X

Report a correction
Lighter 130 g vs 151 g Around 15% lighter
Records higher def video 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps vs 1920 x 1080 @ Unknown 30x higher def video
Higher resolution front camera 10 MP vs 8 MP 25% higher resolution front camera; Video chat with other people

Reviews Word on the street

Samsung Galaxy S4 Active Featured in Best Rugged  vs Moto X 

9.5
10.0
The display is decently bright, though AMOLED displays aren't the best for combating bright sunlight (the HTC One wins that contest) and auto-brightness is ever so slightly dim, though not so much as the Samsung Galaxy S4.
Moto X

8.5
8.5
Anything runs flawlessly, from 3D games and heavy web pages, to any CPU- or GPU-intensive application you can think of.
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active Featured in Best Rugged

9.0
9.0
So, although there is a change in display technology for this device, we can't say it's hugely detrimental: it's still a great 5-inch display.
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active Featured in Best Rugged

8.0
9.0

Overall

8.6 Out of 10
9.0 Out of 10

Specifications Full list of technical specs

screen

Samsung Galaxy S4 Active Featured in Best Rugged  vs
Moto X 
Size 5" 4.7"
Resolution 1920 x 1080 1280 x 720
Touchscreen Capacitive Capacitive
Multitouch Yes Yes
PPI 440 ppi 312 ppi

hardware

Clock speed 1.9 GHz 1.7 GHz
Number of cores Quad core Dual core
RAM 2 GB 2 GB
Internal storage 16 GB 16 GB
Supported card formats
SDXC
SDHC
SD

photo & video

Camera 8 MP 10 MP
Resolution 8 MP 10 MP
Flash Yes Yes
Secondary camera 2 MP 2 MP
Video resolution 1920 x 1080 @ Unknown 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps

cellular

Generation 4G 4G
Networks
LTE (20 Mb/s)
GPRS (0.01 Mb/s)
HSUPA (5.76 Mb/s)
UMTS (0.38 Mb/s)
EDGE (0.38 Mb/s)
EV-DO Rev.A
Unknown (100 Mb/s)
LTE Cat3/4 Uplink (50 Mb/s)
CDMA (0.01 Mb/s)
HSPA+ (84 Mb/s)
LTE Cat3 (100 Mb/s)
HSDPA+ (42.2 Mb/s)
GSM (0.01 Mb/s)

battery

Talk time 1,020 min 780 min
Talk time (3G) 900 min 780 min
Capacity 2,600 mA·h 2,200 mA·h

form factor

Samsung Galaxy S4 Active Featured in Best Rugged  vs
Moto X 
Weight 151 g 130 g
Thickness 9.1 mm 10.4 mm
Size 71.3 x 139.7 x 9.1 mm 65.3 x 129.3 x 10.4 mm

sensors

Has an assisted GPS Yes Yes

music

Supports FM radio No No

software

Operating system Android 4.4.2 Android 4.4.2
Multitasking Yes Yes
App store Android Market Android Market
Adobe flash support No No
App store size 850,000 apps 850,000 apps

connectivity

Acts as a wi-fi hotspot Yes Yes
Supports NFC Yes Yes
Bluetooth Bluetooth v4.0 Bluetooth v4.0
Samsung tablets Samsung Galaxy S4 Active Featured in Best Rugged
Report a correction
Motorola Moto X
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus