Features Key features of the Samsung Galaxy S III mini  vs Moto G 

screen size

Display The Moto G has a modest 4.5-inch 720p LCD display, with pixel density of 329 ppi, it’s able to deliver a fair amount of crispness with things like fine text in the web browser.
Moto G | by PhoneArena (Dec, 2013)

screen resolution

Moto G
1280 x 720
The images it produced were full of detail, sharp and the colours brilliant.
Moto G | by PocketLint (Feb, 2014)

processor

Moto G
Quad core
The Moto G has a Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 processor with 1.2GHz quad-core CPU under its hood and it performs well.
Moto G | by PocketLint (Feb, 2014)

camera resolution

The rear camera is 5-megapixel and the front camera comes in at 1.3-megapixels.
Moto G | by PocketLint (Feb, 2014)

Differences What are the advantages of each

Back view of Samsung tablets Samsung Galaxy S III mini

Reasons to consider the
Samsung tablets Samsung Galaxy S III mini

Report a correction
Screen uses OLED technology Yes vs No About half of smartphones are OLED; OLED screens are typically higher contrast and use less power
Lighter 120 g vs 143 g More than 15% lighter
Thinner 9.9 mm vs 11.6 mm Around 15% thinner
Front view of Motorola Moto G

Reasons to consider the
Motorola Moto G

Report a correction
Supports Adobe Flash Yes vs No Somewhat common; Many games and videos on the Internet require Adobe Flash
More cores Quad core vs Dual core Twice as many cores; each additional core lets your phone do more without visible UI slowdowns and jerkiness
Sharper screen 326 ppi vs 233 ppi Around 40% sharper PPI; enjoy photo-realistic, crisp images
More battery capacity 2,070 mA·h vs 1,500 mA·h Around 40% more battery capacity
Higher resolution 1280 x 720 vs 800 x 480 Around 2.5x higher resolution
Bigger screen 4.5" vs 4" Around 15% bigger screen
Faster processor 1.2 GHz vs 1 GHz Around 20% faster processor; run computation-intensive applications, such as photo editing, faster

Reviews Word on the street

Samsung Galaxy S III mini  vs Moto G 

8.9
9.0
Working with a 2070 mAh battery, it’s a small capacity no doubt, but at least we’re pleased with what it’s able to crank out.
Moto G

Specifications Full list of technical specs

screen

Samsung Galaxy S III mini  vs
Moto G 
Type AMOLED Super IPS LCD2
Size 4" 4.5"
Resolution 800 x 480 1280 x 720
Touchscreen Capacitive Capacitive
Multitouch Yes Yes
PPI 233 ppi 326 ppi

sensors

Has an assisted GPS Yes Yes

music

Supports FM radio Yes Yes

software

Operating system Android 4.4 KitKat Android 4.4 KitKat
Multitasking Yes Yes
App store Android Market Android Market
Adobe flash support No Yes
App store size 850,000 apps 850,000 apps

connectivity

Acts as a wi-fi hotspot Yes Yes
Supports NFC No No
Bluetooth Bluetooth v4.0 Bluetooth v4.0

form factor

Samsung Galaxy S III mini  vs
Moto G 
Weight 120 g 143 g
Thickness 9.9 mm 11.6 mm
Size 63 x 121.5 x 9.9 mm 65.9 x 129.9 x 11.6 mm

hardware

Clock speed 1 GHz 1.2 GHz
Number of cores Dual core Quad core
RAM 1 GB 1 GB
Internal storage 16 GB 16 GB

photo & video

Camera 5 MP 5 MP
Resolution 5 MP 5 MP
Flash Yes Yes
Secondary camera 0.3 MP 1.3 MP
Video resolution 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps

cellular

Generation 3.5G 3.5G
Networks
GPRS (0.01 Mb/s)
HSUPA (5.76 Mb/s)
UMTS (0.38 Mb/s)
EDGE (0.38 Mb/s)
EV-DO Rev.A
Unknown (14.4 Mb/s)
HSPA (21 Mb/s)
CDMA (0.01 Mb/s)
HSDPA (14.4 Mb/s)
GSM (0.01 Mb/s)

battery

Capacity 1,500 mA·h 2,070 mA·h
Samsung tablets Samsung Galaxy S III mini
Report a correction
Motorola Moto G
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus