PhoneRocket Review Our evaluation of Galaxy Ace 3 vs iPhone 4

Performance

Processing power and speed

BrowserMark

Graphics

3D and 2D graphics

AnTuTu 3D, GLBenchmark 2.5 and GLBenchmark 2.7

Battery Life

How long will the battery last

Talk time (3G), Standby time (3G) and Battery capacity

Reviews

How do our trusted review sites rank these products?

Reviews from techradar.com, phonearena.com and gsmarena.com

PhoneRocket Score

Performance, Graphics, Battery Life and Reviews

Winner
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3 

PhoneRocket recommends the Samsung Galaxy Ace 3  based on its performance.

See full details

Benchmarks Real world tests of Galaxy Ace 3 vs iPhone 4

BrowserMark How fast does the web browser load pages

Galaxy Ace 3
2,169
iPhone 4
1,588

Differences What are the advantages of each

Back view of Samsung Galaxy Ace 3

Reasons to consider the
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3

Report a correction
Faster web browser 2,169 vs 1,588 More than 35% better BrowserMark score
Much better theoretical download speed 150 Mb/s vs 7.2 Mb/s More than 20.8x better theoretical download speed; enjoy lightning fast downloads on modern networks
Supports NFC Yes vs No Somewhat common; Enables payment by phone and other wireless communications
Is 4G Yes vs No Somewhat common; Supports the fastest, most reliable networks
Supports FM radio Yes vs No Somewhat common; Listen to music and news from local radio stations
Bigger screen 4" vs 3.5" Around 15% bigger screen
Lighter 120 g vs 137 g More than 10% lighter
More cores Dual core vs Single core Twice as many cores; each additional core lets your phone do more without visible UI slowdowns and jerkiness
Bigger app store 850,000 apps vs 825,000 apps Around 5% more apps; find an app for virtually any task
Faster processor 1.2 GHz vs 1 GHz Around 20% faster processor; run computation-intensive applications, such as photo editing, faster
More battery capacity 1,800 mA·h vs 1,420 mA·h More than 25% more battery capacity
Slightly longer standby time (3G) 22,176 min vs 18,000 min Around 25% longer standby time (3G)
Front view of Apple iPhone 4

Reasons to consider the
Apple iPhone 4

Report a correction
Sharper screen 329 ppi vs 233 ppi More than 40% sharper PPI; enjoy photo-realistic, crisp images
Store more stuff 32 GB vs 8 GB 4x more storage capacity; free yourself from memory cards
Thinner 9.3 mm vs 10 mm More than 5% thinner

Reviews Word on the street

Galaxy Ace 3  vs iPhone 4 

7.0
8.6
Employing a streamlined profile (0.37” thick), the handset is perfectly sized to accommodate every hand size – although, it does pack on some noticeable weight (4.83 oz).
iPhone 4

Specifications Full list of technical specs

screen

Galaxy Ace 3  vs
iPhone 4 
Size 4" 3.5"
Resolution 800 x 480 960 x 640
Touchscreen Capacitive Capacitive
Multitouch Yes Yes
PPI 233 ppi 329 ppi

hardware

Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1 GHz
Number of cores Dual core Single core
RAM 1 GB 0.5 GB
Internal storage 8 GB 32 GB

photo & video

Camera 5 MP 5 MP
Resolution 5 MP 5 MP
Flash Yes Yes
Secondary camera 0.3 MP 0.3 MP
Video resolution 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps

cellular

Generation 4G 3.5G
Networks
LTE Cat3/4 Uplink (50 Mb/s)
LTE Cat 4 (150/)
LTE Cat3
HSDPA (7.2 Mb/s)
HSUPA (5.76 Mb/s)
CDMA (0.01 Mb/s)
LTE Cat4 (150 Mb/s)
EDGE (0.38 Mb/s)
LTE (20 Mb/s)
Unknown (150 Mb/s)
EV-DO Rev.A
HSDPA+ (42.2 Mb/s)
UMTS (0.38 Mb/s)
GSM (0.01 Mb/s)

battery

Talk time (3G) 480 min 420 min
Standby time (3G) 22,176 min 18,000 min
Capacity 1,800 mA·h 1,420 mA·h

form factor

Galaxy Ace 3  vs
iPhone 4 
Weight 120 g 137 g
Thickness 10 mm 9.3 mm
Size 62.7 x 121.2 x 10 mm 58.6 x 114.3 x 9.3 mm

sensors

Has an assisted GPS Yes Yes

music

Supports FM radio Yes No

software

Operating system Android 4.2.2 iOS 7
Multitasking Yes Yes
App store Android Market Apple App Store
Adobe flash support No No
App store size 850,000 apps 825,000 apps

connectivity

Acts as a wi-fi hotspot Yes Yes
Supports NFC Yes No
Bluetooth Bluetooth v4.0 Bluetooth v2.1
Samsung Galaxy Ace 3
Report a correction
Apple iPhone 4
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus