PhoneRocket Review Our evaluation of N9 vs Lumia 920


Processing power and speed

Sunspider 0.9.1


3D and 2D graphics

Nokia N9
Lumia 920
AnTuTu 3D, GLBenchmark 2.5 and GLBenchmark 2.7

Battery Life

How long will the battery last

Talk time (3G), Talk time, Standby time (3G), Standby time and 1 more


How do our trusted review sites rank these products?

Reviews from,, and

PhoneRocket Score

Performance, Graphics, Battery Life and Reviews

Nokia Lumia 920 

PhoneRocket recommends the Nokia Lumia 920  based on its performance, battery life and reviews.

See full details

Benchmarks Real world tests of Nokia N9 vs Lumia 920

SunSpider 0.9.1 Web browser and javascript performance

Nokia N9
3,477 ms
Lumia 920
910 ms

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Nokia N9

Reasons to consider the
Nokia N9

Report a correction
Screen uses OLED technology Yes vs No About half of smartphones are OLED; OLED screens are typically higher contrast and use less power
Store significantly more stuff 64 GB vs 32 GB 2x more storage capacity; free yourself from memory cards
Significantly lighter 135 g vs 185 g More than 25% lighter
Front view of Nokia Lumia 920

Reasons to consider the
Nokia Lumia 920

Report a correction
Much faster javascript execution 910 ms vs 3,477 ms 3.8x better SunSpider 0.9.1 score
Is 4G Yes vs No Somewhat common; Supports the fastest, most reliable networks
Significantly faster processor 1.5 GHz vs 1 GHz 50% faster processor; run computation-intensive applications, such as photo editing, faster
Sharper screen 331 ppi vs 251 ppi More than 30% sharper PPI; enjoy photo-realistic, crisp images
Bigger screen 4.5" vs 3.9" More than 15% bigger screen
More battery capacity 2,000 mA·h vs 1,450 mA·h Around 40% more battery capacity
Higher resolution 1280 x 768 vs 854 x 480 Around 2.5x higher resolution
Longer talk time (3G) 648 min vs 420 min Around 55% longer talk time (3G); go days without charging
More cores Dual core vs Single core Twice as many cores; each additional core lets your phone do more without visible UI slowdowns and jerkiness
Longer talk time 1,116 min vs 660 min Around 70% longer talk time; go days without charging
Thinner 10.7 mm vs 12.1 mm More than 10% thinner
Slightly longer standby time 27,648 min vs 23,040 min 20% longer standby time
Records slightly higher def video 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps vs 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps 2.2x higher def video

Reviews Word on the street

Nokia N9  vs Lumia 920 

It has an excellent rear 8.7 MP camera with a Carl Zeiss lens and backside illuminated sensor that excels at low light photography.
Lumia 920

Throw in the fact that it has good viewing angles and a strong iridescent glow, it’s more than visible in outdoor conditions with the sun present.
Lumia 920


7.4 Out of 10
8.3 Out of 10

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Nokia N9  vs
Lumia 920 
Size 3.9" 4.5"
Resolution 854 x 480 1280 x 768
Touchscreen Capacitive Capacitive
Multitouch Yes Yes
PPI 251 ppi 331 ppi


Has an assisted GPS Yes Yes


Supports FM radio Yes Yes


Operating system MeeGo Windows Phone 8
Multitasking Yes Yes
App store Nokia Store Windows Phone Marketplace
Adobe flash support No No
App store size 104,000 apps 120,000 apps


Acts as a wi-fi hotspot Yes Yes
Supports NFC Yes Yes
Bluetooth Bluetooth v2.1 Bluetooth v3.0

form factor

Nokia N9  vs
Lumia 920 
Weight 135 g 185 g
Thickness 12.1 mm 10.7 mm
Size 61.2 x 116.5 x 12.1 mm 70.8 x 130.3 x 10.7 mm


Clock speed 1 GHz 1.5 GHz
Number of cores Single core Dual core
Internal storage 64 GB 32 GB

photo & video

Camera 8 MP 8.7 MP
Resolution 8 MP 8.7 MP
Flash Yes Yes
Video resolution 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps


Generation 3.5G 4G
HSDPA (14.4 Mb/s)
HSUPA (5.76 Mb/s)
EDGE (0.38 Mb/s)
LTE (20 Mb/s)
Unknown (14.4 Mb/s)
UMTS (0.38 Mb/s)
GSM (0.01 Mb/s)


Talk time 660 min 1,116 min
Talk time (3G) 420 min 648 min
Standby time 23,040 min 27,648 min
Standby time (3G) 27,360 min 27,648 min
Capacity 1,450 mA·h 2,000 mA·h
Nokia N9
Report a correction
Nokia Lumia 920
Report a correction


comments powered by Disqus