PhoneRocket Review Our evaluation of N9 vs 808 PureView

Performance

Processing power and speed

Sunspider 0.9.1

Graphics

3D and 2D graphics

AnTuTu 3D, GLBenchmark 2.5 and GLBenchmark 2.7

Battery Life

How long will the battery last

Talk time (3G), Talk time, Standby time (3G), Standby time and 1 more

Reviews

How do our trusted review sites rank these products?

Reviews from phonearena.com, gsmarena.com, techradar.com and mobiletechreview.com

PhoneRocket Score

Performance, Graphics, Battery Life and Reviews

Winner
Nokia N9 

PhoneRocket recommends the Nokia N9  based on its performance.

See full details

Benchmarks Real world tests of Nokia N9 vs 808 PureView

SunSpider 0.9.1 Web browser and javascript performance

Nokia N9
3,477 ms
808 PureView
4,211 ms

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Nokia N9

Reasons to consider the
Nokia N9

Report a correction
Faster javascript execution 3,477 ms vs 4,211 ms More than 15% better SunSpider 0.9.1 score
Acts as a wi-fi hotspot Yes vs No Somewhat common; Share your cellphone's data plan with other devices
Store significantly more stuff 64 GB vs 16 GB 4x more storage capacity; free yourself from memory cards
Lighter 135 g vs 169 g More than 20% lighter
Sharper screen 251 ppi vs 183 ppi More than 35% sharper PPI; enjoy photo-realistic, crisp images
Thinner 12.1 mm vs 13.9 mm Around 15% thinner
Side view of Nokia 808 PureView

Reasons to consider the
Nokia 808 PureView

Report a correction
Supports Adobe Flash Yes vs No Somewhat common; Many games and videos on the Internet require Adobe Flash
Much higher resolution front camera 41 MP vs 8 MP Around 5.2x higher resolution front camera; Video chat with other people
Faster processor 1.3 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 30% faster processor; run computation-intensive applications, such as photo editing, faster
Longer standby time (3G) 32,400 min vs 27,360 min Around 20% longer standby time (3G)
Longer standby time 27,936 min vs 23,040 min More than 20% longer standby time

Reviews Word on the street

Nokia N9  vs 808 PureView 

7.0
8.5
It’s also much larger than the average sensor used in most compact standalone cameras, thus able to capture more photons on its surface, which makes for excellent low light performance.
808 PureView

Specifications Full list of technical specs

screen

Nokia N9  vs
808 PureView 
Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 3.9" 4"
Resolution 854 x 480 640 x 360
Touchscreen Capacitive Capacitive
Multitouch Yes Yes
PPI 251 ppi 183 ppi

sensors

Has an assisted GPS Yes Yes

music

Supports FM radio Yes Yes

software

Operating system MeeGo Symbian Belle
Multitasking Yes Yes
App store Nokia Store Nokia Store
Adobe flash support No Yes
App store size 104,000 apps 104,000 apps

connectivity

Acts as a wi-fi hotspot Yes No
Supports NFC Yes Yes
Bluetooth Bluetooth v2.1 Bluetooth v3.0

form factor

Nokia N9  vs
808 PureView 
Weight 135 g 169 g
Thickness 12.1 mm 13.9 mm
Size 61.2 x 116.5 x 12.1 mm 60.2 x 123.9 x 13.9 mm

hardware

Clock speed 1 GHz 1.3 GHz
Number of cores Single core Single core
RAM 0.5 GB 1 GB
Internal storage 64 GB 16 GB

photo & video

Camera 8 MP 41 MP
Resolution 8 MP 41 MP
Flash Yes Yes
Video resolution 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps

cellular

Generation 3.5G 3.5G
Networks
HSDPA (14.4 Mb/s)
HSUPA (5.76 Mb/s)
EDGE (0.38 Mb/s)
Unknown (14.4 Mb/s)
UMTS (0.38 Mb/s)
GPRS (0.01 Mb/s)
GSM (0.01 Mb/s)

battery

Talk time 660 min 660 min
Talk time (3G) 420 min 390 min
Standby time 23,040 min 27,936 min
Standby time (3G) 27,360 min 32,400 min
Capacity 1,450 mA·h 1,400 mA·h
Nokia N9
Report a correction
Nokia 808 PureView
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus