PhoneRocket Review Our evaluation of Lumia 520 vs 808 PureView


Processing power and speed

Sunspider 0.9.1


3D and 2D graphics

AnTuTu 3D, GLBenchmark 2.5 and GLBenchmark 2.7

Battery Life

How long will the battery last

Talk time (3G), Talk time, Standby time (3G) and Battery capacity


How do our trusted review sites rank these products?

Reviews from,, and

PhoneRocket Score

Performance, Graphics, Battery Life and Reviews

Nokia Lumia 520 

PhoneRocket recommends the Nokia Lumia 520  based on its performance and reviews.

See full details

Benchmarks Real world tests of Lumia 520 vs 808 PureView

SunSpider 0.9.1 Web browser and javascript performance

Lumia 520
1,444 ms
808 PureView
4,211 ms

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Nokia Lumia 520

Reasons to consider the
Nokia Lumia 520

Report a correction
Much faster javascript execution 1,444 ms vs 4,211 ms 2.9x better SunSpider 0.9.1 score
Acts as a wi-fi hotspot Yes vs No Somewhat common; Share your cellphone's data plan with other devices
Significantly lighter 124 g vs 169 g More than 25% lighter
Quite a bit thinner 9.9 mm vs 13.9 mm Around 30% thinner
More cores Dual core vs Single core Twice as many cores; each additional core lets your phone do more without visible UI slowdowns and jerkiness
Sharper screen 233 ppi vs 183 ppi More than 25% sharper PPI; enjoy photo-realistic, crisp images
Better theoretical download speed 21.1 Mb/s vs 14.4 Mb/s More than 45% better theoretical download speed; enjoy lightning fast downloads on modern networks
Side view of Nokia 808 PureView

Reasons to consider the
Nokia 808 PureView

Report a correction
Supports Adobe Flash Yes vs No Somewhat common; Many games and videos on the Internet require Adobe Flash
Much higher resolution front camera 41 MP vs 5 MP Around 8.2x higher resolution front camera; Video chat with other people
Screen uses OLED technology Yes vs No About half of smartphones are OLED; OLED screens are typically higher contrast and use less power
Supports NFC Yes vs No Somewhat common; Enables payment by phone and other wireless communications
Longer standby time (3G) 32,400 min vs 21,600 min 50% longer standby time (3G)
Faster processor 1.3 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 30% faster processor; run computation-intensive applications, such as photo editing, faster
Store slightly more stuff 16 GB vs 8 GB 2x more storage capacity; free yourself from memory cards

Reviews Word on the street

Lumia 520  vs 808 PureView 

It’s also much larger than the average sensor used in most compact standalone cameras, thus able to capture more photons on its surface, which makes for excellent low light performance.
808 PureView

It's a great way of saving space and very useful for lumping similar apps, like games or email, together.
Lumia 520


8.0 Out of 10
7.7 Out of 10

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Lumia 520  vs
808 PureView 
Size 4" 4"
Resolution 800 x 480 640 x 360
Touchscreen Capacitive Capacitive
Multitouch Yes Yes
PPI 233 ppi 183 ppi


Has an assisted GPS Yes Yes


Supports FM radio Yes Yes


Operating system Windows Phone, 8.1, 8 Symbian Belle
Multitasking Yes Yes
Adobe flash support No Yes


Acts as a wi-fi hotspot Yes No
Supports NFC No Yes
Bluetooth Bluetooth v4.0 Bluetooth v3.0

form factor

Lumia 520  vs
808 PureView 
Weight 124 g 169 g
Thickness 9.9 mm 13.9 mm
Size 64 x 119.9 x 9.9 mm 60.2 x 123.9 x 13.9 mm


Clock speed 1 GHz 1.3 GHz
Number of cores Dual core Single core
RAM 0.5 GB 1 GB
Internal storage 8 GB 16 GB
Supported card formats

photo & video

Camera 5 MP 41 MP
Resolution 5 MP 41 MP
Video resolution 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps


Generation 3.5G 3.5G
HSDPA (21.1 Mb/s)
HSUPA (5.76 Mb/s)
EDGE (0.38 Mb/s)
Unknown (14.4 Mb/s)
UMTS (0.38 Mb/s)
GPRS (0.01 Mb/s)
GSM (0.01 Mb/s)


Talk time 888 min 660 min
Talk time (3G) 576 min 390 min
Standby time (3G) 21,600 min 32,400 min
Capacity 1,430 mA·h 1,400 mA·h
Nokia Lumia 520
Report a correction
Nokia 808 PureView
Report a correction


comments powered by Disqus