Benchmarks Real world tests of 808 PureView vs Ascend Y300

SunSpider 0.9.1 Web browser and javascript performance

808 PureView
4,211 ms
Ascend Y300
2,319 ms

Features Key features of the 808 PureView  vs Ascend Y300 

screen size

screen resolution

808 PureView
640 x 360
Ascend Y300
800 x 480

memory

Ascend Y300
0.51 GB

processor

808 PureView
Single core
Ascend Y300
Dual core

camera resolution

Differences What are the advantages of each

Side view of Nokia 808 PureView

Reasons to consider the
Nokia 808 PureView

Report a correction
Supports Adobe Flash Yes vs No Somewhat common; Many games and videos on the Internet require Adobe Flash
Much higher resolution front camera 41 MP vs 5 MP Around 8.2x higher resolution front camera; Video chat with other people
Screen uses OLED technology Yes vs No About half of smartphones are OLED; OLED screens are typically higher contrast and use less power
Supports NFC Yes vs No Somewhat common; Enables payment by phone and other wireless communications
Longer standby time (3G) 32,400 min vs 19,200 min Around 70% longer standby time (3G)
Faster processor 1.3 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 30% faster processor; run computation-intensive applications, such as photo editing, faster
Longer standby time 27,936 min vs 19,200 min More than 45% longer standby time
Store more stuff 16 GB vs 4 GB 4x more storage capacity; free yourself from memory cards
Better theoretical download speed 14.4 Mb/s vs 7.2 Mb/s 2x better theoretical download speed; enjoy lightning fast downloads on modern networks
Back view of Huawei Ascend Y300

Reasons to consider the
Huawei Ascend Y300

Report a correction
Much faster javascript execution 2,319 ms vs 4,211 ms Around 45% better SunSpider 0.9.1 score
Much bigger app store 850,000 apps vs 104,000 apps Around 8.2x more apps; find an app for virtually any task
Acts as a wi-fi hotspot Yes vs No Somewhat common; Share your cellphone's data plan with other devices
Significantly lighter 130 g vs 169 g Around 25% lighter
Quite a bit thinner 11.2 mm vs 13.9 mm Around 20% thinner
More cores Dual core vs Single core Twice as many cores; each additional core lets your phone do more without visible UI slowdowns and jerkiness
Sharper screen 233 ppi vs 183 ppi More than 25% sharper PPI; enjoy photo-realistic, crisp images
More battery capacity 1,730 mA·h vs 1,400 mA·h Around 25% more battery capacity

Specifications Full list of technical specs

screen

808 PureView  vs
Ascend Y300 
Type AMOLED IPS LCD
Size 4" 4"
Resolution 640 x 360 800 x 480
Touchscreen Capacitive Capacitive
Multitouch Yes Yes
PPI 183 ppi 233 ppi

sensors

Has an assisted GPS Yes Yes

music

Supports FM radio Yes Yes

software

Operating system Symbian Belle Android 4.1 Jelly Bean
Multitasking Yes Yes
App store Nokia Store Android Market
Adobe flash support Yes No
App store size 104,000 apps 850,000 apps

connectivity

Acts as a wi-fi hotspot No Yes
Supports NFC Yes No
Bluetooth Bluetooth v3.0 Bluetooth v2.1 + EDR

form factor

808 PureView  vs
Ascend Y300 
Weight 169 g 130 g
Thickness 13.9 mm 11.2 mm
Size 60.2 x 123.9 x 13.9 mm 63.6 x 124.5 x 11.2 mm

hardware

Clock speed 1.3 GHz 1 GHz
Number of cores Single core Dual core
RAM 1 GB 0.51 GB
Internal storage 16 GB 4 GB
Supported card formats
microSD
SDHC
SD

photo & video

Camera 41 MP 5 MP
Resolution 41 MP 5 MP
Flash Yes Yes
Video resolution 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps 480 x 480 @ 30 fps

cellular

Generation 3.5G 3G
Networks
HSDPA (14.4 Mb/s)
HSUPA (5.76 Mb/s)
EDGE (0.38 Mb/s)
Unknown (14.4 Mb/s)
UMTS (0.38 Mb/s)
GPRS (0.01 Mb/s)
GSM (0.01 Mb/s)

battery

Talk time 660 min 300 min
Talk time (3G) 390 min 300 min
Standby time 27,936 min 19,200 min
Standby time (3G) 32,400 min 19,200 min
Capacity 1,400 mA·h 1,730 mA·h
Nokia 808 PureView
Report a correction
Huawei Ascend Y300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus