PhoneRocket Review Our evaluation of One vs Butterfly S

Performance

Processing power and speed

Passmark

Graphics

3D and 2D graphics

GLBenchmark 2.5 and GLBenchmark 2.7

Battery Life

How long will the battery last

Talk time (3G), Standby time (3G) and Battery capacity

Reviews

How do our trusted review sites rank these products?

Reviews from phonearena.com, mobiletechreview.com, gsmarena.com and androidpolice.com

No winner declared

Too close to call

Benchmarks Real world tests of HTC One vs Butterfly S

passmark Processor performance including multiple cores

HTC One
3,199
Butterfly S
2,915
Processor and Memory The Butterfly S is powerful enough to deliver very smooth performance.
Butterfly S | by PhoneArena (Sep, 2013)

GLBenchmark 2.7 3D graphics performance

HTC One
17 fps
Butterfly S
16.1 fps
It features the new Krait 300 quad-core processor with the clock set at 1700MHz, 2GB of RAM and graphics are taken care of the Adreno 320 GPU.
HTC One | by PhoneArena (Mar, 2013)

GLBenchmark 2.5 3D graphics performance

HTC One
46 fps
Butterfly S
42.9 fps

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of HTC One

Reasons to consider the
HTC One

Report a correction
Slightly more processing power 3,199 vs 2,915 Around 10% better passmark score
Store much more stuff 64 GB vs 16 GB 4x more storage capacity; free yourself from memory cards
Acts as a wi-fi hotspot Yes vs No Somewhat common; Share your cellphone's data plan with other devices
Records significantly higher def video 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps vs 1920 x 1080 @ Unknown 30x higher def video
Lighter 143 g vs 160 g More than 10% lighter
Sharper screen 468 ppi vs 440 ppi More than 5% sharper PPI; enjoy photo-realistic, crisp images
Thinner 9.3 mm vs 10.6 mm More than 10% thinner
Back view of HTC Butterfly S

Reasons to consider the
HTC Butterfly S

Report a correction
Much longer talk time (3G) 1,500 min vs 818 min Around 85% longer talk time (3G); go days without charging
Significantly more battery capacity 3,200 mA·h vs 2,300 mA·h Around 40% more battery capacity
Longer standby time (3G) 39,600 min vs 29,952 min More than 30% longer standby time (3G)
Faster processor 1.9 GHz vs 1.7 GHz More than 10% faster processor; run computation-intensive applications, such as photo editing, faster
Bigger screen 5" vs 4.7" More than 5% bigger screen
Better theoretical download speed 42.2 Mb/s vs 20 Mb/s More than 2x better theoretical download speed; enjoy lightning fast downloads on modern networks

Reviews Word on the street

HTC One  vs Butterfly S 

9.1
8.0
Battery: Amazingly, for a device of this caliber, we’re impressed with the battery life put out by its 2300 mAh battery.
HTC One

Specifications Full list of technical specs

screen

HTC One  vs
Butterfly S 
Type Super LCD3 Super IPS LCD2
Size 4.7" 5"
Resolution 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
Multitouch Yes N/A
PPI 468 ppi 440 ppi

hardware

Clock speed 1.7 GHz 1.9 GHz
Number of cores Quad core Quad core
RAM 2 GB 2 GB
Internal storage 64 GB 16 GB

photo & video

Camera 4 MP 4 MP
Resolution 4 MP 4 MP
Flash Yes Yes
Secondary camera 2.1 MP 2.1 MP
Video resolution 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps 1920 x 1080 @ Unknown

cellular

Generation 4G 4G
Networks
LTE (20 Mb/s)
GPRS (0.01 Mb/s)
HSUPA (5.76 Mb/s)
UMTS (0.38 Mb/s)
EDGE (0.38 Mb/s)
CDMA (0.01 Mb/s)
HSDPA+ (42.2 Mb/s)
GSM (0.01 Mb/s)

battery

Talk time (3G) 818 min 1,500 min
Standby time (3G) 29,952 min 39,600 min
Capacity 2,300 mA·h 3,200 mA·h

form factor

HTC One  vs
Butterfly S 
Weight 143 g 160 g
Thickness 9.3 mm 10.6 mm
Size 68.2 x 137.4 x 9.3 mm 70.5 x 144.5 x 10.6 mm

sensors

Has an assisted GPS Yes Yes

music

Supports FM radio Yes Yes

software

Operating system Android 4.4.2 Android 4.3
Multitasking Yes Yes
App store Android Market Android Market
Adobe flash support No No
App store size 850,000 apps 850,000 apps

connectivity

Acts as a wi-fi hotspot Yes No
Supports NFC Yes Yes
Bluetooth Bluetooth v4.0 Bluetooth v4.0
HTC One
Report a correction
HTC Butterfly S
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus